That’s the question that John Fox seeks to answer in a recent eBook addressing “management blunders.” Fox, author of The Marketing Playbook, is convinced that most companies don’t apply the same discipline to marketing that they apply to product development.
Result? They fall short of the goals they’ve set — or more ambitious goals that they could be reaching.
Echoing some of the themes in our recent position paper Masters of Client Discovery, Fox identifies five key reasons that sales teams are underperforming. Just as we pointed out in our piece, he notes that sales professionals are being asked to do things that should be delegated to others. The 5 key management blunders he recognizes:
- Letting sales reps decide which marketing activities get done. Instead of creating an advanced marketing system, many companies expect their sales people to hunt for their own business. The reps naturally request support that addresses their own personal interests. This creates a “hodgepodge activity list,” but it doesn’t encourage you to focus your marketing resources on the stages of the sales process where deals are getting stuck. As a result, deals disappear.
- Making sales reps responsible for their own marketing work. Over the years, marketing departments have abdicated many responsibilities to sales reps — making them busier, but no less productive. Indeed, reps are often responsible for generating leads, producing presentations and constructing proposals. Industry sources suggest that sales reps spend as much as 40% of their time (16 hours per week) engaged in marketing-related tasks. That’s time not invested preparing for key meetings, building relationships and closing deals.
- Allowing sales reps to be responsible for the customer qualification mix. By allowing sales reps to determine which prospects you engage, you will needlessly disperse and diffuse your limited resources. It’s critical to have focused qualification criteria — ones that determine whether a prospect is a good fit — to ensure your resources are optimally deployed.
- Expecting sales reps to take on an educating, nurturing role with customers and prospects. The sales rep’s time is often wasted merely educating prospects at an early stage of a buying process — time that is taken away from guiding buyers through the later stages of a decision. To avoid this problem, marketing needs to step into the role of educator and nurturer.
- Turning sales reps into overpaid secretaries and clerks. Companies often expect their sales reps to “record everything” and encourage them to spend an excessive amount of time on clerical work. Again, this time must be taken from other activities. By reducing clerical demands, you free up your sales people to focus on closing business.
Buyers now expect sellers to know their business, listen and provide sound advice, and create a “win-win” situation, according to research from Development Dimensions International. Sales, in other words, is more demanding than ever. Fox cites this data point to make the case that companies need “repeatability in their marketing operations for the principal purpose of creating traction for sales reps.”
So what must happen to end the blundering? Focus marketing on the activities that will create this traction, while empowering sales reps to concentrate on what they do best.





Nice writing style. I look forward to reading more in the future.
Hello, yes exactly we need to provide such things which causes sales impotence. We, mymavenlink@gmail.com, help organizations get the results they want by improving the way their people communicate and perform to overcome these kind of situations.
Many companies rarely realize the true value of their marketing organizations. If a sales person is one of your most valuable resources using them on non revenue producing activities is a real waste!
When marketing and sales get into alignment and truly qualified leads are placed in the hands of their sales teams real sales growth can begin.
Tonya, Your post makes a lot of great points. One that stands out is rep-level targeting and pursuit decisions. These decisions should be based on prospect analysis, profiling, scoring and formal insight. When deciding which deals to pursue far too much authority is often given to individual sales reps – with no disincentive for tying up as much company resource on their deals as possible. Ironically, in many companies sales reps cannot confirm flight reservations without VP approval, but those same companies allow reps to spend tens or even hundreds of thousands of resource dollars on unqualified, poorly aligned prospect pursuits.
Great blog! Looking forward to reading more!
Matt Smith, 3forward.com
Many thanks for your kind words in your review of my eBook, 5 Management Blunders.
John Fox, Venture Marketing